In space no one can see you smile.

Let’s talk legs up.

Inefficiencies & fair value gaps.

Two of these boxes turned out to be very useful.

1: The top of this weekly inefficiency was the target, slam dunk. The bottom of the range also is proving to be usable.

2. I don’t see why this weekly inverse full value gap was much use. Price went back and forth like it was not even there.

3. This weekly fair value gap gap was usable for support once price crossed over it.

4. The daily fair value gap did not get any closes below, so the bottom level was useful.

Now, when I said, that this Divergent Pitch followed by the 3 Bollinger Breaches was a temporary top, I used an indicator.

When I said, that this by itself wasn’t a top, because the volatility was too muted, I used an indicator.

When I said that the mean reversion’s targets are the Upper Guard rail, the 20-40 pips area below the Green River, I used an indicator, displacements and statistical, instrument dependent knowledge.

When I said, that this Push to the upside would be followed by an Echo I used multiple indicators, including my own inventions.

The little box’s top and and bottom are two statistically likely distances from the top for the Echo to come from.

Making indicators contributes to understanding some of these functions and shapes my thinking.

I used an RSI2 to recognize that the flat line had a 5-wave stucture to it.

But of course you knew all of these without any indicators, because there was a Reaper Breaker Inverted Fair Value Mitigation on the 15 minute timeframe. Do you ever hear yourself out at all?

Since I do need indicators, I made one for capital deployment.

Arrows show the “short loved” side’s entries.

if (ExtATRBuffer2[i]>29 && High[i]>BBU[i]-50*Point) BBU_[i]=iBands(symbol,30,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i);
if (MathAbs(ExtATRBuffer[i])>29 && Low[i]<BBD[i]+50*Point) BBD_[i]=iBands(symbol,30,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i);

---

Therapeutical 80’s dico music.