Hi, my name is Jack and I’ll be your hijacker today.

Everything’s been going like clockwork for several months in terms of terminal patterns coming about and playing out to the T.

Today, there was a shocker move: the zero got run over.

After the volatility breach / break out the price would settle back to the 30 SMA for a reset. The move from there towards back to the BB gets cut short by the Aggression. That’s player one (with a Zero shirt on) positioning at one side of the volleyball net. Player 2 tries to hit back the ball. If he/she slips, there is a helper by the end of the BB field. That’s a second touch for serving back the ball. If the second player drops it as well, the break is on.

Similarly, now the price is expected to settle back to the S30 net for another Aggression that would be received by the Zero and there would be another game where hijacking becomes a possibility.

---

Now let’s move onto Baroness Münchausen.

With that tumbnail image and a random snapshot of a 26k Robin Hood account with a daily gain of $570 (2.23%) from somewhere are meant to be the definite proofs for her claim of making 6.5 million in 2 years starting with a negative balance.

“I turned $26 to 26k, then to 100k”…

This is a terrible future we are veering towards. The bigger liar you are, the less spine you have, the higher the likelihood of you succeeding and getting rewarded in life.

742k views of this absolute nonsense.

“There is the retail and the institutional approach. You can trade it either way.”

Sure, it is a personal preference to make money or to lose.

After this you need to ponder a bit about how much people like Graham Stephan and Yassir Paffrath are inflating their bottom lines as well.

Graham would sell his mother for a revenue producing YouTube video, refer to his insurance policy of making a vid on giving his girlfriend 100k to max out returns.

Disgusting these people are.