Back in the eighties, some Volvos had a button on the stick shift, it was called the halver.
So, I drew these first.


(as you can see a money flow reversal zone was printed by the last money flow extreme, 1.0876 has been called in since)
Then I updated the shape’s filters on the downside because I thought, what if you don’t get 52 pips?

So the discount’s criteria was that the price dipped below the 240-BB.
///shape long
if ((ExtATRBuffer[i]<52 && ExtATRBuffer[i+1]>52
&& ExtATRBuffer2[ArrayMinimum(ExtATRBuffer2,10,i)]>2
&& ExtATRBuffer[ArrayMaximum(ExtATRBuffer,10,i)]<64)
|| (ExtATRBuffer[i]<42 && ExtATRBuffer[i+1]>42 && Close[i+2]<iBands(symbol,0,240,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+2) ))
The last time we saw a triple divergence was with Wave 3 on the way up.

There was a higher high made later, but Wave 4 made it to 175 pips in 7 trading days. Important stats.
Now, the slight problem is that time has slowed down. If I want to see a minimum 42 pips, I can by the doubling of the sample size and measure from that swing high.

The dilemma is that I can almost show for the 42, but why is this staying off the 240-BB? Is this some relative weakness? Would this dip happen still? Hanging out till LaGarde speaks?
The Yellow Sun is hinting that there may be an Echo start pending in the next hour. That would leave a 10-pip moratorium field beyond the low that forms a fractal.
The dumbest thing I have ever heard in this life was this guy saying that time does not exist in the market. Tell it to someone who makes their living on Theta decay. What do you put on an indicator’s X-axis?