So, there is this dilemma of keeping a memory of a volatility expansion.
As a first step I can see making a version of the 15-min ATR targets and make a plot for the previous consolidation mean and some “previous W3” boxes plots – and then I need to do some more thinking of what and how could be carried over to a daily chart.
As a reminder, a Vicious Sell means that the lower Safety Line (0.28) is going to get taken out next.
Also, we have just come back to a virgin spinner.
So, a gypsy gal at one of the brothels in my home town told me back in the days that they were the property of “Szeva”.
Of course I was interested in finding out how the good old guy’s life has shaped up and YouTube has its segments.
It’s about x3 again. If no x1 gets printed in the opposite direction for 46 hours, the wind dies away.
This would be the 2nd “time out” implementation into the Triple F directional logic, and God knows I love logical circuits at least as much as the next man.
The fearure that I decided to latch onto was not letting the energy consolidate (go above 53) plus price went outside the 5.9 line in the near past plus apathy from the Municipals.
For once I am not positive that the trade to E-44 makes sense, because it is technically an x4 starting a second batch, and until now volatility has been calling the shots.
“Don’t wanna be a victim of a system I did not create.”
Humanity is made up of natural born scammers.
The hope for AI is that it is something that can be abused for political, financial gain, to get rich off a hype where the worst case scenario is to sell something virtually worthless to some company that is cash heavy or maybe improve on something as the occassional arrhythmia. Bottom line is that we’re ethically fcked.
Write an essay instead of you ditching plagerism charges, convince others that they are talking to an actual human being… Take away jobs, dignity, the very reason to exist, to aspire. You are up to no good from the getgo.
Why is hallucinating alternate histories is of benefit to anyone? Answer this, right before Large Language Models take over the world.
What can’t you make a bottom or top without?
Counter directional volatility.
When price does not even get to the opposing F1 @ 1.0912 (yellow histogram print) they are not even trying.
Crack #4 is a 41+ pips registered. Nowhere to be found.
There is a lower money flow reversal zone…
The last consolidation mean plus the 3-day ATR would make an attainable zone from 1.0836-1.0821. The stochastic is embedded to the downside.
Nick Rhodes puts the next daily supports at 1.0824, 1.0803 and 1.0775.
The RSI2 is nowhere near oversold enough for a turn.
I opened 10 lots short on Thursday – meant 0.10, I closed out the trade at break even (+$15) whilst knowing that the next stop would be the S-356M.
I opened at 1.09375 and the move against me was about 5 pips.
What I should had done was manage the trade.
A diagonal integration would be pressing the pencil conscience, further stops every 10 pips out, CODE 2 for locking in better than break even. Snowballing in. That 10 lot could had made me 70 pips cca $7000 without taking on the additional 1 extra lot every 10 pips. This is what I meant in my profile by looking for a Trader Tom, whom could maximize the leverage – I can find the trades.
!10oh means +10 lots (overhedge)
!1bstp means +1 lot every 10 pips out – counting back from the target
Step #2
Also, fresh 50% consolidation box re-visits should be loaded up with 10 lots or more.
From the CounterRejoyce, the low volatility consolidation boxes & continuation lines:
That’s all I had to say. I made shy of $300 on Thursday and shy of $200 on Friday. I knew where the next call point would be. I should had made $10-15k at a minimum. Not even 1/30th of my own potential. I was at work, and was nervous around the CPI liquidity drop – these are not real excuses.
I feel vertically disintegrated.
Dumped out my 10 lot holding in 2 terms. What an idiot. Even the CODE 2 was put on, which would had locked in 1.5 pips after 4 in gains and 3 after 8.
I did say that a weak downtrend can relapse any time to the upper safety line.
I also said that the lower safety line was a reaction point.
You are looking at Peter Reznicek’s letter “h”.
Bow, bow black sheep.
The bow goes back to F2- to F2 from the low (57-62 pips) – the reason for the color choice is to be a reminder.
The market is going from condition to a level. A collision with a hot Safety Line is a condition.
F3- is a level.
To be exact, F3- is 1.0873.
A spinner was made. A lower low is a high probability.
The likelihood is a bottom made around the S-356. On the other hand, if the MA does not prompt counter directional volatility, the new color would become strong red.
…and then there was the question unanswered still, what if I gave my weakest auto trading routine 90% of the possible volume.
Duration: 2 years & 1 month.
Initial deposit 10k.
Volume allowed: up to 2000 lots for the first long and the first short in line with available equity.
374,459% gains.
It is ok to close your mouth now. This is getting close to the potential.
I certainly blew a fuse in the 90s when I saw the following two commercials in quick succession in New Zealand. The first one was an extremely graphic DUI, where the guy relieved over and over again the same sequence is events, where his car hits a little girl who bounces up in the air. “She was only 4 years old!” – he was bursting out repeatedly at a maximum level of distress. The collision was played back a few times in a row. Without any delay came on the second commercial which was burgers sizzling on a grill – possibly some McDonalds stuff. I had some extra appreciation for this tasteful serving as a vegetarian, yet nothing could have ptepared me for the level of morbidity that in the UK comes standard.
Euston, we have a problem.
I did not have a camera with me that day in Forest Gate. Picture a small church with a garden with crypts surrounding in every direction. Most lids are cracked, moved a bit, it is a maze virtually, hard to find a path without lots of turns from the outer gate to the building’s entrance. I just could not believe my eyes: there was a party on this burial ground with speakers, a grill flipping stand where one guy was busy producing and handing out burgers (rare to medium rare to capture the spirit of the occassion I suppose, the bloodier the better) right on top of the crypt marbles. Crammy little place this London is. If I needed more signals, later that week I saw an AD for a church that was up for rental, and I was set to write my satire about the AIR-Church&B where they speak of their best customers highly: the absolute favoutire were the Satanists, whom turned the crosses back upright and meticulously washed up the sacrificial blood from the floors before handing back the keys.
Back to trading
What’s the Expi-rationale behind Expriration? TIME (& weakness).
Just as the Loneliness Correction taking 16 hours and the Disregard Correction taking 21 hours, the Weak Trend gets cancelled in 35 hours (70* 30 minutes) when not making any progress beyond the Safety Line’s shield. See below the flip back from weak uptrend to strong downtrend.
///Direction Flip Back Down For No Strength (Safety - 5 pips )
I’d say the start of the correction was no coincidence. The yellow line is a previous P/NR, the darker green field is the highlight of the dip into the Municipal Trench and the lighter green field is the shield of the lower Safety Line.
If you needed any more confluence two more conditions triggered the same time. The aforementioned MFI oversold hand in hand with the 120-sample stoch dipping back below the 50-line for the first time.
What kind of a correction was this?
Well, if it had stopped at the 16th hour, it would had been a Loneliness correction, but since it went to 21, this was a Disregard correction. (It is not obvious, but price went up first on candle 21.) The difference is the degree of cooling down. A Disregard can be the origin of a more potent move, so this wold mean a New Wave over a New Leg.
I know why you are here. The auto trading stuff.
I have made 3 different EAs this year, the Municipal Trader, the W3 trader and the W3 + F3 trader.
I have been talking about what a loss of potential limiting the position size at 100 lots per trade was.
I have started feeding some volume to the weakestof the 3 routines based on bottom line score for the same period, the W3 trader.
It was made to open maximum 2 longs and 2 shorts. Now I allow multiple chunks for one of the longs and one of the shorts for up to 1000 lots total. I’d say I opened up the volume faucet to about 60 percent, just to get a better idea about its potential.
I figured 10 million was attainable. The reality?
All of a sudden a $499 price tag for an ex4 seems like a joke. I am not in a kidding mode, I would sell one source code for $49k (one of the three, and nothing more) and not take all of my secrets with me and the same time not giving fuel to the next generation of scammers.
Warning! The previous blog entry has high Lectin content. You might want to talk to somebody about the role of Butyrate trading.
There is 50 shades of red, but I only care for 2.
The pale one is a weak downtrend. It means that price is still above the S-356 where it has to prove itself to be upgraded. How? By failing to make a bottom, failing to make F (full discharge) prints.
When a Tomato relapses (most likely by the hands of the Municipals), the restart would come from the upper Safety line – see below.
This one failed the Municipal Trench, ricocheted to the 2.8 Safety and hammered out a bottom at the S-356 in a rather volatile manner, getting a third start just shy of the Safety.
The directional logic is the feature of the Axel S V1.6
This one below went into a stong downtrend in 4 hours, as it had no hope of making a bottom above the S-356 band.
The following example shows a failure to make a top and a weak uptrend receiving an upgrade to a strong one.
You can see the same thing in reverse: the great scare of the Lower Safety line as well as finding support in the Municipal Trench (aiding the coast through the S-356).
Oh snap, juglling with 4 colours now?
I don’t know & I don’t understand why can’t a man be a man.
In other news, in a moment of weakness I added F3 fades to the W3 trader & ran a backtest.
As a reminder, this is what the W3 could score (without lot size increase beyond 100 lots) from the 30th of November, 2021.
& this is what the W3 + F3 combo could achieve during the same period:
It seems to get increasingly hard to push far beyond the 3 million barrier within 2 years when the maximum lot size for a single position is capped by the broker at 100 lots. (I got to 3.65 million with a version of the Municipal trader once.)
Can you guess what my next move would be?
I am not going to investigate how to optimize the F3 fade, it would be too costly in time and may not be worth the effort. Also, I design these auto trading routines as complementers for hybrid trading where I would only call for the long side help and instead of being at mercy of the broker for spread changes, no stop losses would be applied, instead a gradual 3-step hedging would be implemented.
ForexFore - Internals, indicators, algorithmic trading 