you can’t complain about coherence and consistency

I gave you the yellow level yest.

notes again

#1: spike out / dog fight (can improve on its final number) – pull back to shy of 8 EMO
#2: spike out (can fall short at times) – come back beyond S30 (shy if steep angle)
#3: max velocity – 7-12-28 pips beyond #1/#2’s furthest; #3 can be cut short before the BB at times

database

& now for the opposite yellow…

I wrote this down yest on notepad.

This market is not going to stop going up until a

D|-0-1-2-3 or a
A-0-1-2-3 pattern happens (Aggression requires the touch of the S30 prior)

Buy:
lower BB,
the 0 after the D| / A (8-9 pips beyond S30)
10 pips inside the BB after the 1 and the 2

counterforce -28 is ideal for adding

1-2-3 has to come in a quick succession, otherwise 0 can repeat

Little did I know what they had in store in less than 16 hours into the week.

This was an A-0-123 pattern at resistance at the highest speed possible. Breach 3 never scored a close outside which is highly unusual.

Also I started adding the violation 3 30-min close back opens and closes as two different levels of intetest (interrupted lines).

Now it looks like at a minimum we’re gonna tag the yellow virgin level underneath. A lower low is a possibility, but not a must.

A liquidity snake could salvage the uptrend question, but for that price would have to dip at least 52 pips. Get below 1.0994 within 7 hours, or my name would not be Parabolic Snails.

 
    if ((((iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i)-iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i))*10000>58
   
  
   &&  Low[i]<iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i) 
    && 
    (High[i+2]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+2) || High[i+3]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+3)
    || High[i+4]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+4) || High[i+5]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+5)
    || High[i+6]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+6)))
     ||
    (iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,7,i))-Low[i]> 520*Point && Low[i]<iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i) && High[i+7]>iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+7))
    )
     && (iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,7,i))-iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,18,i+7))>520*Point
      || (iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+7)-iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+7))*10000>27
     
     )   && iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,7,i))-Low[i]<950*Point
    ){
          ObjectCreate("Palmat"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, 0, Time[i], Low[i]+10*Point); 
          ObjectSetText("Palmat"+DoubleToStr(i), "pATIENT 0", 32, "Impact", DarkGreen);
          if (iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+4)-iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+4)<300*Point && iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+4)-iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+4)>260*Point) ObjectSetText("Palmat"+DoubleToStr(i), "pATIENT 0", 32, "Impact", DarkGray);

…

The market had a healthy bounce off of the weekly S2.

The continuation divergence is now set (C).

A 5th wave sould match / slightly beat the high. A measurement of using the legth of the W1 gives 1.1290+ for a target.

The overlap of Wave 1 and Wave 4 is the norm.

The big picture is that the Y wave would conclude after this Wave 5 up that can be improved upon by the following volaility whip.

So that would be up mostly for the first 2 weeks of August. The daily 20-sample Bollinger would likely be hit at some point.

The one reactive area is the daily fair value gap’s top marked with the red X.

Happy trading!

It’s an anniversary, so let’s throw some mothafuckas on the fire.

Chad GPT

The Fake It Till You Make It programme does not come with given things. Random things go into the blender. Andrew Tate’s “genius” Matrix analog, stretching – that’s a must, loads of health conscience, longetivity made poular by Bryan Johnson. Add crypto in the mix. A Chad GPT person scissors and magnifies. Numbers? 200x!

“Everything’s a ponzi”. That’s right, Mr. Argentina, nothing to cry for me about. Every stock in the world is a pump and dump scheme.

Does anybody ever think about how does this foreigner end up with a Green Card? The last time overstayers could be sponsored was in 2001. He is not married, had a toilet cleaning job – not the high demand kind.

Ilusiveness and vail of fog. “A man coming from afar can say whatever they want” – a Hungarian saying.

Quotes from the Kodaly’s Hary Janos Wikipedia Entry.

“…his stories are not true is irrelevant, for they are the fruit of a lively imagination, seeking to create, for himself and for others, a beautiful dream world.”

“According to Hungarian superstition, if a statement is followed by a sneeze of one of the hearers, it is regarded as confirmation of its truth.”

The Sneezers

The YouTubers don’t care about fact checking. They care about clicks, watches and likes, as those translate to revenue, thus truth is irrelevant and credibility gets forged by big names.

Have you made a mill? – asks Sebastian.

20 milllion here, 20 million there. Somehow he managed to short all the big crypto bankruptcies whilst not having any of his money in Tether or at an exchange like FTX. Proof? Nowhere. Credibility: a loss of 3.5 million.

Moved to Puerto Rico, because of the 3% tax rate. He must be rich then. Everybody who moves there is a millionaire.

He claims to have to pay 1 million in taxes. That’s a 3% of what number that was multiplied by 200?

There are claims like having turned 5k to 100k in 7 months, but no proof of any kind. Whatever happened with the 2 million float on crypto to have a 50k short be safe.

The snapshot numbers are – as best I can make them out:

Entry price: 20,770 market price 20,318.55

P&L 3,144.11 (10.87%)

It seems to be the same software that Crypto Face is streaming with whilst selling a useless TradingView indicator in record quantities for 1.5k a pop.

The best trading advice of your life is coming up…

Straight from the video titled: “I trade on a Different level.”

Every scammer has a smartness. When a gypsy said he was going to take my Mustang for a test drive and then transferred it onto his name and sold it, that was his m.o.

Luke Belmar charges 15k for his “Capital Club” membership. Lambo Raul has a dental specialist father and he sells “trade signals” (made by his friend, Albert) to compliment his income whilst posting videos of trading with a demo account.

I also wanted to touch upon the shock therapy part. You would be less prone to mulling over the content when you receive a beat up session. The aggression and jerk attitude also slipped into the blender of Mr. Agent Puberty.

433k views, money is starting to roll in bitchez!

As for the having lost 45 pounds part…

…

I was thinking to get a curly wig and a straw hat and a raw eggplant / cucumber and pose for a “trying on the Wagamama Bahama Mama 25-billion dollar diet”, but I will be going to a different part of the Caribbean.

…

I’m a cosmo-electrician

(maybe more, maybe less)

closer than your next of kin

angel, devil of the night

…and the seed of everything

How do I know that the low is in?

I base it on 3 things.

1st: 4H RSI2

Current:

Previous ones:

Filter:

Low[i+1]<guardraild[i+1] && RSI2[i]>2 && 
   ((RSI2[i]<RSI2[i+1] && RSI2[i+1]>.5 && RSI2[i+1]<3.5 && RSI2[i+2]<4.5)
   || (RSI2[i]>RSI2[i+1] && RSI2[i+1]>.5 && RSI2[i+1]<3.5 && RSI2[i+2]>3.5  && RSI2[i+2]<7 
   && iMFI(symbol,0,14,i+1)<45 
   && iMFI(symbol,0,14,i+1)>25  ))

2nd: Money flow final beat. Both last calls were off by less than a pip.

Filters:

  if (mfi[i+12]>mfi[i+13] && mfi[i+12]>mfi[i+11] && mfi[ArrayMaximum(mfi,3,i+11)]>mfi[ArrayMaximum(mfi,23,i+15)] && mfi[i+12]>79 && iStochastic(symbol,0,120,3,3,MODE_SMA,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_MAIN,i)>28){
            ObjectCreate("Sal"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, indicator_window+1, Time[i+10], mfi[i]+mfi[i]*.2); 
        ObjectSetText("Sal"+DoubleToStr(i), "Sell Beats: "+DoubleToString(NormalizeDouble(iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,16,i+1))+80*Point,4),4)+", "+DoubleToString(NormalizeDouble(iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,16,i+1))+140*Point,4),4)+", ("+DoubleToString(NormalizeDouble(iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,16,i+1))+220*Point,4),4)+")", 22, "Impact", Black); 
         if (iStochastic(symbol,0,120,3,3,MODE_SMA,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_MAIN,i+12)<88 || iStochastic(symbol,0,120,3,3,MODE_SMA,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_MAIN,i+12)>96.8) ObjectSetText("Sal"+DoubleToStr(i), "Vindicated MFI strength", 22, "Impact", DimGray);  
      }
      
         if (mfi[i+12]<mfi[i+13] && mfi[i+12]<mfi[i+11] && mfi[ArrayMinimum(mfi,3,i+11)]<mfi[ArrayMinimum(mfi,23,i+15)] && mfi[i+12]<21 && iStochastic(symbol,0,120,3,3,MODE_SMA,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_MAIN,i)<72){
            ObjectCreate("Sals"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, indicator_window+1, Time[i+10], mfi[i]-mfi[i]*.2); 
        ObjectSetText("Sals"+DoubleToStr(i), "Buy Beats: "+DoubleToString(NormalizeDouble(iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,16,i+1))-80*Point,4),4)+", "+DoubleToString(NormalizeDouble(iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,16,i+1))-140*Point,4),4)+", ("+DoubleToString(NormalizeDouble(iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,16,i+1))-220*Point,4),4)+")", 22, "Impact", Black); 
         if (iStochastic(symbol,0,120,3,3,MODE_SMA,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_MAIN,i+12)>10) ObjectSetText("Sals"+DoubleToStr(i), "Vindicated MFI weakness", 22, "Impact", DimGray); 
      }

Filtering is art. Filtering is science. Filtering is my life.

3rd: Compare & enjoy

In what way are these two images one and the same? (Top VS Bottom)

Let’s rotate and annotate.

D|: divergent pitch; 0: Zero entry; 1,2,3 are the 3 BB breaches & was over

Where are the purple lines from? They are the Divergent Bats (D| = S). Fire sales without getting up to the 30-sample BB.

The thing about trading is that everybody seems to talk about volatility, yet nobody seems to understand it intimately since John Bollinger.

A single number cannot substitute the two, directional measurements.

It is always the one chart that you stopped looking at that holds all the keys.

The neon blue people were sitting on that ask. E-50 is what they had in mind.

The opportunity is excellent to talk about a feature of the Conveyor: a 30-minute close outside is a buy. A 30m close back inside, and the market has to prove that the momentum is still present. Otherwise… this very thing can happen. Outside day down.

The Magenta line is the 8 EMO. Candles are a must for this one.

The Guard Rails are a product of my vivid imagination. They don’t exist.

h2 I would put somewhere above 1.1095. From there there may be a fork. If h2 gets broken after some retracement, the whole thing flips bullish and starts a new H-h count to the upside. Otherwise an H3 should make a beat beyond the H2, 1.0923 would be the next logical level down.

Since this is going to likely print a Divergent pitch here (DI), the bears would get an opportunity to run with this momentum by stepping in just beyond the S30 (blue), somewhere in the 1.1044-1.1088 area.

Wrong 1: Not everything is part of a wave structure. The episodes of Extra High energy reverses (XX) and compressed volatility at some point may trigger a whipping “revenge”. This move may end with a higher high / lower low beyond the established wave structure at times.

Wrong 2: Wave 3 may actually be a lot weaker than a Wave 1, since the M, Measuring leg only starts drawing after a breach of the 2SD 30 sample BB. I know, E.W. says Wave 3 cannot be the weakest of the 3 impulses, it is the impression that plants in people’s heads that is the problem here.

Wrong 3: Wave 1 and Wave 4 cannot overlap. You can see 2 overlaps out of the last 3 wave structures above.

The biggest problem with their system is the lack of quantifying anything. There is no measuring stick, only looks and likes. I believe using the Choppiness is a way of overcoming a lot of the problems.

This idea of the “Wave 3” up on the Euro, that Pippoletto and others are beating away at…

…does not represent the expectations of the futures markets. The further out we go in time, the more dollar strength seems to be the theme.

Remember, it is a relative game. The Dollar is losing its value, but this does not mean that this would be the overall case against the Euro.

The Push of this run up was made, a “Wave 4” is now a whisper away from the “Wave 1”. A continuation divergence is about to print on the Daily chart.

The Echo (quasi Wave 5) may or may not make a higher high. Typically there would be a beat anywhere from 1 to 64 pips, and do not forget, that the “Volatility Whip” when the Volatility bursts out of the compression can do the same thing as an Echo could, which is anywhere from falling short to making a 110-pip beat (at the end of a more complex / triple wave structure separated by continuation divergences “C” – see below).

Dear Streets of Earth City,

what was missing for a low? The second B.

2 examples below:

The two B-s were followed by a 60+ pips rally, then a liquidity break that either made a slight beat or fell shy of the last B.

What was the level to fail with the current, bullish configuration (E414>E712 by 27+ pips)? 3rd row.

Manipulacija or liquidity break? Either way, the resultat is the same.

Yellow line shows the divergence between the B fractal (which was a divergence end point itself) and the current move.

…and it’s broken.

Patient 0 gets a counter directional move verification.

    if ((((iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i)-iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i))*10000>58
    &&  Low[i]<iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i) 
    && 
    (High[i+2]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+2) || High[i+3]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+3)
    || High[i+4]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+4) || High[i+5]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+5)
    || High[i+6]>iBands(symbol,60,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+6)))
     ||
    (iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,7,i))-Low[i]> 520*Point && Low[i]<iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i) && High[i+7]>iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+7))
    )
     && (iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,7,i))-iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,18,i+7))>520*Point
      || (iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+7)-iBands(symbol,0,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+7))*10000>27
     
     )
    ){
          ObjectCreate("Palmat"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, 0, Time[i], Low[i]+10*Point); 
          ObjectSetText("Palmat"+DoubleToStr(i), "pATIENT 0", 32, "Impact", DarkGreen);
          if (iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+4)-iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+4)<300*Point && iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i+4)-iBands(symbol,0,15,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i+4)>260*Point) ObjectSetText("Palmat"+DoubleToStr(i), "pATIENT 0", 32, "Impact", DarkGray);
          
          ObjectCreate(0,"DRACHUPPER"+DoubleToStr(i),OBJ_TREND,0,Time[i],Low[i],Time[iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,8,i)],iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,8,i)));
ObjectSetInteger(0,"DRACHUPPER"+DoubleToStr(i),OBJPROP_RAY_RIGHT,False);
ObjectSet("DRACHUPPER"+DoubleToStr(i),OBJPROP_COLOR,clrPowderBlue);
ObjectSet("DRACHUPPER"+DoubleToStr(i),OBJPROP_WIDTH, 8);

 ObjectDelete("Hallelujah");
              ObjectCreate( "Hallelujah", OBJ_HLINE, 0, Time[i], iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,3,i)) );
               ObjectSet("Hallelujah", OBJPROP_COLOR, clrDarkGreen );
               ObjectSet("Hallelujah", OBJPROP_WIDTH, 5 );
               ObjectSet("Hallelujah", OBJPROP_STYLE, 2 );

    }

Here’s what I think is going to happen.

H1 would be about 60 pips below the Lower Guard Rail on the 4H (cca 1.1040-1.1030)

(mirrored example)

h1 would come back up to the Upper Guard Rail (and a bit) cca 1.1180

H2 would make a lower low 1.1010 or just below

h2 would come back up to that 1.1180 level, fall shy of the h1

H3 would print at 1.097x -> break of h2, HH above 1.13

In space no one can see you smile.

Let’s talk legs up.

Inefficiencies & fair value gaps.

Two of these boxes turned out to be very useful.

1: The top of this weekly inefficiency was the target, slam dunk. The bottom of the range also is proving to be usable.

2. I don’t see why this weekly inverse full value gap was much use. Price went back and forth like it was not even there.

3. This weekly fair value gap gap was usable for support once price crossed over it.

4. The daily fair value gap did not get any closes below, so the bottom level was useful.

Now, when I said, that this Divergent Pitch followed by the 3 Bollinger Breaches was a temporary top, I used an indicator.

When I said, that this by itself wasn’t a top, because the volatility was too muted, I used an indicator.

When I said that the mean reversion’s targets are the Upper Guard rail, the 20-40 pips area below the Green River, I used an indicator, displacements and statistical, instrument dependent knowledge.

When I said, that this Push to the upside would be followed by an Echo I used multiple indicators, including my own inventions.

The little box’s top and and bottom are two statistically likely distances from the top for the Echo to come from.

Making indicators contributes to understanding some of these functions and shapes my thinking.

I used an RSI2 to recognize that the flat line had a 5-wave stucture to it.

But of course you knew all of these without any indicators, because there was a Reaper Breaker Inverted Fair Value Mitigation on the 15 minute timeframe. Do you ever hear yourself out at all?

Since I do need indicators, I made one for capital deployment.

Arrows show the “short loved” side’s entries.

if (ExtATRBuffer2[i]>29 && High[i]>BBU[i]-50*Point) BBU_[i]=iBands(symbol,30,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_UPPER,i);
if (MathAbs(ExtATRBuffer[i])>29 && Low[i]<BBD[i]+50*Point) BBD_[i]=iBands(symbol,30,30,2,0,PRICE_MEDIAN,MODE_LOWER,i);

---

Therapeutical 80’s dico music.

D-bat day.

A divergent pitch is a conscious let go of a direction to free up resources and perhaps come back in with a little less stretch to secure faster progress.

When the same people / other eager participants step back in with force before the 30-min BB – just beyond the 30-min 30 SMA, that may be causing an enough of a surprise that can keep on expanding at or faster than the Bollinger Bands themselves. The time window to place the price on the conveyor belt from the 0 entry seems to be 4×30 mins.

Belt highlights in yellow.

If the above time limit isn’t met, a rally may still evolve: a top won’t be made during a squeeze.

When the 60-min 30 sample BB HL2 drops below 58, the bands are as good as not present. They won’t be able to start containing price until they expand wide enough. To gain overall volatility there would likely have to be a downside open soon.

The very reaoson for the above consolidation not breaking lower was the 4H money flow in need of a divergent beat.

Penetrating the powder box more than half way is clear intention to continue.

The h1 pullback should take price back below the 9-day EMA by 20-40 pips.

Picture below shows the 30-min volatility breaches counted 1-3. Conveyor not activated.

The Counterfore routine source was posted here earlier. 8-sample diectional stochastic readings (between bracket high/low &, current low/high), but I moved down to the 30 minutes frame in the meantime.

Winner, winner, volatility dinner. Downside volatity opening up to the numbers below which are in excess of 30 pips. Once past the buy limit, the volatility becomes l’art pour l’art.

Now

If God has a master plan, then only he master understands…

To the conveyor den…

Hungry like an evolve…

Show me what squeeze is all about… (what kind of marketing spiel is giving a German title to an album that has all English lyrics?)

I want to rape free…