I’m on the record for calling the Mastodon while it was printing.

No chest dangling here, I traded like a biach afterwards.

I went from the initial position of 9 lots long and 10.9 lots short to 9.5 lots long and 7 new lots of shorts by the end of the day, and wasted all of my short prior holdings covering them for chump change, like I always do. Don’t laugh, I only collected $420 today, bringing the month’s total to $5,576.60.

Now, the part where I gain some traction here (perhaps you can too) is drawing conclusions and making the necessary adjustments for the future.

The first miss of the day was not knowing how important a break is at the M print that was not preceded by a zero.

What I already had right was graying out the zero to the downside if it settles above the E-67 band.

///////////zero on the bottom
if (RSI2[i+1]<2.5 && RSI2[i]>3  && RSI2[i+8]>3 && RSI2[ArrayMinimum(RSI2,6,i)]<=RSI2[ArrayMinimum(RSI2,5,i+7)] )
 if (iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,12,i))-iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,i))>320*Point  && Low[i+4]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+4)
                        && Low[i+3]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+3) && Low[i+4]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+4) && Low[i+5]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+5)
                          &&  Low[i+6]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+6)
                      && Low[i+7]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+7) && Low[i+8]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+8) && Low[i+9]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+9) && Low[i+10]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+10)
                      && Low[i+10]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+11) && Low[i+11]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+11) && Low[i+12]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+12) && Low[i+13]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+13)
                      && Low[i+14]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+14) && Low[i+15]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+15) && Low[i+16]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+16) && Low[i+17]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+17)
                      && Low[i+18]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+18) && Low[i+19]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+19) && Low[i+20]>iMA(NULL,0,67,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_HIGH,i+20))
                       ObjectSetText("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), "W1/A", 42, "Arial Black", clrRed);
                      }
                       else ObjectSetText("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), "0=1?", 22, "Arial Black", clrDimGray);

The Orange M had a level of importance that from now on it needs to be underlined.

I circled the hourly close below that 20-pip displacement, which also happens to be a close below the 2-sd 62-sample Linear Regression line.

The filter obviously is the sheer lack of a valid lower zero print in the last 46 samples and the RSI2 a little more precise.

if (RSI2[i+1]<10 && !zerodn[i+1] && !zerodn[i+2] && !zerodn[i+3] && !zerodn[i+4] && !zerodn[i+5] && !zerodn[i+6] && !zerodn[i+7] && !zerodn[i+8] && !zerodn[i+9] && !zerodn[i+10] && !zerodn[i+11] && !zerodn[i+12] && !zerodn[i+13] && !zerodn[i+14] && !zerodn[i+15] && !zerodn[i+16] && !zerodn[i+17] && !zerodn[i+18] && !zerodn[i+19] && !zerodn[i+20] && !zerodn[i+21] && !zerodn[i+22] && !zerodn[i+23] && !zerodn[i+24] && !zerodn[i+25] && !zerodn[i+26] && !zerodn[i+27] && !zerodn[i+28] && !zerodn[i+29] && !zerodn[i+30] && !zerodn[i+31] && !zerodn[i+32] && !zerodn[i+33] && !zerodn[i+34] && !zerodn[i+35] && !zerodn[i+36] && !zerodn[i+37] && !zerodn[i+38] && !zerodn[i+39] && !zerodn[i+40] && !zerodn[i+41] && !zerodn[i+42] && !zerodn[i+43] && !zerodn[i+44] && !zerodn[i+45] && !zerodn[i+46])

The second thing I had to correct was another filter, this time for the Four-counter, which was much too restrictive initially to pick up the second fresh zero-sequence-starter first hour, due to looking for a too high RSI2 reading in the last 10 samples.

if (RSI2[i+1]>2.5 && RSI2[i]<2.5 && RSI2[ArrayMaximum(RSI2,10,i)]>56.5)
          cdncounter[i]=0;

That 4-count is there to remind me of the due inactivity: you need to let the market auction to play out in the following 3 hours, and only name your sell cover after the time was up (C-buy print on the chart.)

Now, let’s concentrate on the ellipses below for a guidance on what may happen next here.

Volatility is rampant currently, one break out occurring after the other – that’s flag #1

The vertical ellipses are there to call attention to a 4-hour move that comes with 50% increment from an already good sized 4-hour candle.

if (Period()==60 && iHigh(NULL,240,i+3)-iLow(NULL,240,i+1)>FSize*27*Point && iLow(NULL,240,i+1)<iLow(NULL,240,i+3) && iLow(NULL,240,i+1)-(iHigh(NULL,240,i+3)-iLow(NULL,240,i+1))*.5<iMA(NULL,0,52,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_LOW,i)-FMax*5.5*Point && !(iClose(symbol,240,i+1)>iMA(NULL,240,52,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_MEDIAN,i+1) && iLow(symbol,240,i+1)<iMA(NULL,240,52,0,MODE_EMA, PRICE_MEDIAN,i+1)) && iLow(NULL,240,iLowest(NULL,0,MODE_LOW,3,i))<iLow(NULL,240,iLowest(NULL,0,MODE_LOW,9,i+3))-250*Point){
           LowBuffer2[i*4]=iLow(NULL,240,i+1);
            HighBuffer2[i*4]=iLow(NULL,240,i+1)-(iHigh(NULL,240,i+3)-iLow(NULL,240,i+1))*.5; 

The point is, the move is deemed significant and receives a projection line. The significant move of course can be at the end of a structure or at the start of it.

In our case, the upside channeling confirmation value was not hit at 1.1699, but the one on the bottom got called in at 1.1580 – the first evidence for further downside to come.

The second evidence is the horizontal ellipse, which is the hotstepper line borrowed from the Energy Bands (proprietary). Being below it is not a good omen.

The third evidence is the strength of the move & the projection down to 1.1462.

The fourth evidence is the impulsive looking wave structure, where the continuation divergence is about to kick in the next wave down.

It looks like wave 4 of Wave 3 is going to end by the close for this week. Wave 4 would only start after the taper of Wave 3 ends, and then there still would have to be a Wave 5.

The fifth element evidence is the sudden pause before the 1.1524 for a consolidation.

The only counter argument here would be a double bottom / higher low – but I do not see any rejection here for now.

Over & out.

The sixth evidence is the strong rejection from the 20% level on the Comfort Levels: you are headed for a lower low, and the window envelope interrupted red would be down around 1.1450 next week.

Freeze – reminder

Ma Baker

Ma Dalton (in Hungarian)

…

I created the Price, Method, Techno methodology and trained 100 Billion people I may also have created Insanity with a smidge of Shamwow. Forbes magazine paid me to be on their cover from here on till eternity.

First, price has to magnetically induce magnetism which cteates a total meltdown.

Meanwhile, back in the future we examine the acceleration coil that has been trapping price between the two Mastodons.

ECB policy statement is pending, and you can almost feel the Bollinger Bands tightening around your skin tightly – visually by the rings around the rosary and audibly thanks to Sonic, the hhog.

How to play this?

Clearly a break out trade, but lots of fake outs if you try too close.

This is where I mention about the M-Hedge lines (white combo). They are 20-point displacements of highest high/ lowest low around the M-s. That’s when I would try. Once the trigger level was hit (it is good for a quick scalp) start scaling in to the direction of the breakout in progress; price is not going to be let dipping back in the accelerator range. Stop losses could be made tight.

I would ride the break out until a new Mastodon print appears (RSI2 peak print between 87.5&94.5 or 12.5&2.5).

I should also mention that I made a trail stop option that only starts locking in gains after the RSI2 goes overbought/oversold depending on direction.

Of course, the two magic numbers had to be made exempt for the all of other trail stops.

Let’s refrain from mentioning the lack of refrain in this Meta-verse (pun intended) & let’s go back to buying Teslas by the pair.

…

Zero has printed, Mastodon – not yet

First, some market psychology.

I had a headline shuffled in saying that EUR/USD pierced resistance at 1.1655 this morning – I did not ask for this opinion.

First and foremost, don’t listen to news. They serve someone’s purpose. The broker wants you to buy when they know that there is no more upside. Being contrarian may serve you at times, but you will ending up negating things you shouldn’t as well.

The idea is the same as cutting the picture of a Coca Cola into the film roll for seconds, so you only perceive it subconsciously. After a while you start handling things as your own facts, no matter who put them in your head.

Now, for the technical part: resistance by what standards?

There is no such thing as objective resistance. The 16-pip wide (1/2 fulctuation-size) salmon box due to an RSI2 reversal divergence starting from a new higher high beating the preceeding 26-sample range

score[i]<1 && score[i+1]>0 && High[i+1]>iHigh(symbol,0,iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,20,i+6))
    && score[iHighest(symbol,0,MODE_HIGH,20,i+6)]>score[i+1]

The yellow box is due to the presence of the End Line (the purple diagonal), which is basically an energy discharge notification (CI-7 crosses below 51). The box itself is displaced by 16 pips (1/2 fulctuation-size) on the closer end and 1.2x fluctuation size at the further end.

High[j]+FSize/2*10*Point, Time[j], High[j]+FSize*1.2*10*Point

The idea behind these yellow and blue boxes is that you should be fading moves arriving here if they are against the right direction (it went too far in the wrong direction).

Now, which is the right direction?

All comes down to the wave count.

If you just saw an ABC correction to the upside, what do you think is coming next?

Wave 1, of course. Wave 1 is expected to fall shy from the landing zone of Wave 3 measured by the 15_MIN_ATR_TARGETS routine. As a body insert (label), the core routine was posted here.

Wave 1 is expected to fail before the closer end of the orange box, usually by 20 pips or somewhat less.

The other method is the mirror effect of the pop of the 3 standard deviaton displacement of the 62-sample Linear Regression line (Effect-Counter Effect) – these have al been posted lessons.

What is the expectation for a Wave 2? Faking out the second Doji by 4-9 pips.

What comes next? Wave 3 to the downside, with the ATR box re-adjusted by consolidation.

Back to Psychology, how many times did you hear Ira Epstein mentioning Fibo Nazis? Zero. His targets are the Bollinger Bands, Window Envelopes and moving averages.

A playlist of David Paul vids, he talks about training CFAs somewhere in these 10-min shorts, and how they are shaking their heads when they hear “Fibonacci”.

I can’t stress enough how important the Wave ID list is that I posted in the Taper Harley entry.

I have a quick tab on my phone to remind me of what I am looking for as an end to the current wave.

Anti Pasta? – Pro Pasta!

Hedging inflation with Crypto is another disaster waiting to happen. A quote from below:

…with all this said, the best formula for calculating S1 is measuring a fluctuation maximum (42 pips) from the last continuation divergence.

Learn something that I did this week.

There was this rally where you would think it had to be impulsive, because of its powerful nature, and you would put numbers on the waves, and you would be… wrong.

See, my initial reaction was that wave 5 would come next, or wave 5 got somehow absorbed, etc.

The first problem here is that both a Wave A and a Wave 1’s mo was identified as a 0M. Further adding to this was the fact that price crossed over the E-67 band, which would push your thinking more towards a Wave 1.

The third problem was the shallow pullback to 1 sd beyond the 62LR line. Surely that had to be Wave 2 – not.

The fourth problem is looking for an absolute extreme for a Wave B ending instead of a 14-sample lowest low / highest high and that it ended 1sd out, not at the 62LR.

The proper wave count was of course corrective.

C in fact was so powerful, that it blew past the 3-DAY ATR reversal zone of a normal Wave 3, which capped out at 1.1654.

Having a corrective wave structure at hand, your mind can be more relaxed instead of having to anticipate a beat beyond a Wave 5. This ABC was the wave 5. Now we have a missing beat to contend with on the other end, below 1.1524.

By the way, the 4-hour Wave 2 & Wave 4 continuation divergence was picked up correctly by the Overdrive240 routine.

Besides these new findings, now I’m starting to apply the new wave-id principles on the daily chart as well & keep on updating the Wave id list that I posted in my Taper Harley blog entry.

Inflation is always, always a Milton Friedman quote.

What is tapering in trading?

A ends in a 0M at 2sd
B ends with single Zero around 62 LR or 1sd, B can be very short
C ends with a taper (0M) or a triple M or acceleration (single Zero) at 2sd

A full length ABC takes the 9-sample stoch oversold / overbouģt twice

When an ABC ends with a bang, don’t be rushing in in its original direction
Rember, a new serving would only be stopped by a 0M

1 ends with an MD (0M) beyond E-67
2 (rushed) ends with an S at 1 sd
2 (all out) ends with faking out the 2nd doji / 1sd
2 should come back through the far end of E67

3 ends with a taper (pushing back highs sold/lows bought multiple times) likely in the ATR box
4 (rushed) ends with an MD & sets up continuation divergence relative to 2
4 (all out) ends in a 0M by 2st & takes price oversold / overbought twice on stoch 9
4 (absorbed) may not register on the timeframe, but 5 could add on gains beyond what was reasonable from 3 (ATR +30% projection); the result could be short lived

5 ends with a bang – still shy of the record set by 3 (perhaps @ the 2sd failure line), likely with a no break extension

There would be good times coming, where all investments would yield measly returns, and the trader shall be king, so let the good times stroll…

From your birth everything is preparing you for the ultimate truth.

In the next part you will learn to distinguish between a B leg and a Wave2 pullback – by yourself (or be sold for camels).

The first 3 would be Wave B terminals, then a Wave 2. Ready?

Trust me, knowing that you saw a Wave 2 versus a Wave B can help you set all of your future steps straight.

Did you capture it or let it slip?

5 dromedaries, a mighty good deal.

Could not find Monty Python’s Attila the Hun tv show either on YouTube for free. Shame.

Press the left mouse button to continue…

…

Informative part

w1 buys the right for a wave structure by scoring beyond the closer end of the E-67 band; it normally arrives with directional volatility, i.e. the hourly fractal to fractal travel length exceeds 28 pips; relative to the consolidation level it usually peters out 20 pips shy of the 3-day ATR

w2 comes bavk through the E-67 band and takes the hourly RSI2 to oversold (20)/ overbought (80) at least on a temporary basis

w3 exhausts the available energy and typically ends with a visible hourly RSI2 reversal divergence; the suspect zone for this divergence to end is the box that is on one end 3-day ATR distance away from the consolidation level and 30% further at the other end; you should not be defying the progress of the wave 3 since it makes a break out and the counter directional volatility is low until reaching inside the box

w4 is letting the counter directional volatility slip out of the gate twice; typically you would be able to spot a measuring leg and a divergent leg on the hourly RSI2: a slight undercut of the first fractal printed by w4 should be a great entry for a w5; it is also a common place that strength wise the w4 makes a beat beyond what w2 managed to muster thus setting up a continiation divergence

w5 makes / tries to make a beat (a no break / coasting move) beyond the exhaustion level; the beat itself may be anywhere from 2-28 pips away (less than fluctuation size) from the outlier point made by w3 so you should be scaling out of holdings and scaling in for a counter directional wave structure; you could have a staircase for instance at 2, 8, 17 and 26 pips and put most weight on 8 and 17; w5 would make an attempt to replicate the maximum strength printed by w3 but would ultimately fall shy of it

from here on an ABC correction should follow at a very minimum: a Wave 2 should be retracing and making a beat beyond the 2nd hourly doji that was made on the way

a fake out of the doji may mean 4-9 pips beyond its centre

The above knowledge about wave structure, length measurements, volatility changes, divergences (programming knowlege wouldn’t hurt either) are things that a trader should be in posession of.

Trading requires 3 different sets of skills, that of an Execution Trader’s, a Trader’s and a Trading Strategist’s (above the level of a chartist).

These 3 sets of skills are almost never held by a single person.

Those selling courses and memberships online are little more than Execution traders, regardless of what they are posing as.

For a good sense of what a Trading Strategist does, read the last sentences in th Neverending Embedding.

Nonsesical part

What’s cracking snake gang… Err… I mean…

Hey there, fake-eye nation! Take it G-Easy!

What do you mean?

When I say, my name isn’t Caleb Maddox, I mean it.

When I say I didn”t go to Yale for nothing, I mean it.

If I ever say I can F you rich, I mean it.

When I say there is only coffee in this cooler, I mean it (just ask my drinking buddy chief of research).

When I say I’m long the inflation trade, I mean it.

When I say I drive 4 quads of a BMW-M, on your screen you can see it – made a segment just for that (I called it “The Call” , noone is going to suspect anything).

I think she’s starting to suspect something.

Unfortunately there’s still more to the RSI2 story – boy, it’s more than I dared to think about.

So let’s play master & serpent.

Observations.

There is always a serving side and a counter side.

Serving is taking the lead.

Serving / opening is usually done by a Single Zero.

On occasions the serving rights would be taken over by a triple 0, a triple M or even triple S, so peel an eye out for these.

& all this s*t is going down at a complete disregard for the current market type.

Countering a serve is a Zero + M combination typically.

If the ball manages to make progress between the Zero and the M, one more hit may be necessary.

Observe.

0 = Zero

0/S = Single Zero

M = Measuring Leg / Mastodon / Magenta

S = Shy of an M

Unfortunately, being the server side does not mean that you will get to make the next serving from a gain, it is possible to counter the server into a retreat & even to take over the serving rights on the fly.

Observatory.

What if the serving side gets to return the ball with a wrist flap leaning into the net at the M line? That means wave 3 of the same wave structure was put on the plate. Eagerness on the serving side, no time to prepare for digestion on the other. (No Time To Compute)

If I know so much more about the subject than anyone else, how can I still perform poorly?

Trading is hard. You need to have the right definitions for everything and noone can tell you about what even needs defining.

This is why I am in the market 92% of the time all the time.

No, I did not get a margin call, nor did I have to top up the margin. I let down myself by disregarding the everybody’s long sentiment, falling in love with the idea of a move back to the Keltinger band first for a major crash, thus implanting the wrong fears on top of rolling out and deleting hedge orders amid confused undefined conditions. One better not play like that.

To get things back under control, steps have to be taken.

Definitions are to be put right.

Embedded market: 3 weeks spent over 75 or below 25 by the measurement of 18-sample 3 delay D line. No daily or other metric to interfere with this.

The process of mbedding neutralizes the initial toxic effects of the overbought/oversold condition – the new environment. It is like a diver who has to equalise the inner and outer pressure having arrived at a new depth.

The most important puzzle piece is black and white hedge entry and exit definitions if you have holdings.

Must hedge 10+2 pips beyond the first M-axis attempt drawn fractal.

Must hedge upon a violaing close on the wrong side of the M-axis, 2-pips beyond the hourly low/high printed.

Hedge exits are – 2FS oversold at 2nd green/ red zone / 2-std (14 sample) window envelope encounter with the same color combo.

For further uniformisation, the 3 other stochastic measurements should be more or less identical across time frames: the Comfort levels alway derive the range made out of 4H samples regardless of the plotted time frame, and the Crack Ho is a 60-sample 3 delay lo/hi hourly stochastic D (120 sample on 30-min, 15 sample on 4H), the 9-sample 3 delay hi/lo hourly stochastic D for a long term/ medium term / short term feel. The 60 & 9 as a pair can bring attention to low risk continuation locations where the move far appart whilst the 60 is staying low / high.

The 2x fluctuation size displacement (overbought / oversold neckline for the day) is always calculated from 4H consolidation levels derived from a 7-sample CI reading and this would serve as a better substitute during the embedding phase versus the 15-min ATR projections as the volatility changes become less linear.

The main tool becomes the quarter lines: the 15%, the 50% displacements of last week’s range and a 3-rd zone can start at the window envelope.

Here is where the double clutching / 2x effect becomes visible and by now I have implemented the “push” function (open palm – push away the mountain) to bring attention to a move that has completely crossed over zone 2 (the 15-50% segment). Be like water.

Look at how only every second hit of the buy zone matters. The week after the push week there is a good opportunity to add / re-enter with the second settlement in mind.

Tips & tricks

I gave away a good trick in my Keltinger Moat article.

Love kills & volatility builds.

Even the most notorious move is not likely to be lent more than 12 legs.

The more thinly traded / scatteted the order flow, the longer price can travel in an undisturbed fashion until it finally runs out of rope.

Leg 10-12 are likely going to start from beyond the 121 EMA on the hourly (a clue should had been failing to carry out a proper mean reversion). 7-9 are from beyond E-89 and the first and second trifecta are expected to come from beyond the closer end of the E-16 band and from beyond E-32.

So yes, Luka I think you have seen all 12 legs.

Additional Credits:

& a known sequence of events…

WEEKLY embedded to the upside, E-21 is a buy for 280+ pips or to the window envelope

WEEKLY embedded to the upside, a violation of the last week’s buy zone before the E-21 is a counter trade buy for at least 70 pips or to the window envelope

WEEKLY embedded to the downside, E-21 is a sell for 280+ pips or to the window envelope

WEEKLY embedded to the downside, a violation of the last week’s sell zone before the E-21 is a counter trade sell for at least 70 pips or to the window envelope

2nd settlements closing back outside the box are a counter trend trade back to one of the continuation zones: E-21 / last week’s catch zone

On a break/push of a smiley target the window envelope

Tying off loose ones in this one.

LimbedIn

Here’s an example of slipping with dishonesty – someone I had to unfollow on LinkedIn. (You should always, always be suspicious of cell phone statement snapshots.) This guy in particular was pretending to have an auto trading routine. He had huge lot sizes, always round ones, 20, 40 lots typically trading gold on Forex. Had a stop loss, as it was proven with occasional losses to make it look more plausible. He seemed to be all overjoyed even over a 1.8 pip gain which was awkward, because when trading for real the slippage on the broker’s side could easily turn that very trade to a losing one. Then with a new statement there was a 20.01 lot trade that transpired. When you delete the previous lot size, the manual trading app defaults to .01 lots. Then you enter 20 not noticing that the 1 micro lot is still there, giving away that you have diddly squat for an auto trading routine and you are not trustworthy due to running a scam.

Shifting a vector

How do you figure out the displacement for a parallel line, when the projection fractal does not coincide in time segment with either of the two known coordinates to be able to make a simple deduction?

/////////// M on the bottom & to find a Zero-Mastodon lower combination...
////////// without the parallel line projection
else if (RSI2[i+1]<6 && RSI2[i]>18  && RSI2[i+3]>6){
                        ObjectCreate("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, 1, Time[i+1], 37); 
                        if (dir[i]>0) ObjectSetText("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), "M-buy", 42, "Impact", clrChartreuse);
                      else ObjectSetText("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), "M.", 42, "Impact", clrOrange);
                      ObjectSet("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJPROP_BACK,1); 
                      monbottom[i+1]=true;
      if (i>2 
    //  &&  iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,i))<=iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,i-3)) 
      && iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,3,i-1))<=iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,22,i+3))  
     &&  RSI2[i+1]<6  
      && RSI2[ArrayMinimum(RSI2,16,i+2)]<RSI2[i+1]
       )   {
                       ObjectSetText("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), CharToStr(211), 48, "Webdings",  clrGreen);
                      //ObjectSetText("Panaceadc"+DoubleToStr(i), "M", 42, "Impact", clrPurple);
                      mastodon[i]=Low[i+1];
                      ObjectCreate("Panaceadd"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, 0, Time[i+1], iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,4,i-1))-30*Point); 
                      ObjectSetText("Panaceadd"+DoubleToStr(i), "Axis", 22, "Impact", clrBlack);
                      ObjectSet("Panaceadd"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJPROP_BACK,1); 
                     
                      j=i+6;
                      while (j<i+13 && !zerodn[j]) 
                      { if (iFractals(symbol,0,MODE_LOWER,j) && Low[j]>iMA(symbol,0,67,0,MODE_EMA,PRICE_LOW,j)) break;
                      j++;
                      }  
                    
                      if (j<i+13){
                        ObjectDelete("Outilery"+j); 
                        ObjectCreate(0,"Outilery"+IntegerToString(j),OBJ_TREND,0,Time[iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,j-1)],iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,j-1)),Time[iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,4,i-1)],iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,4,i-1)));
                        ObjectSetInteger(0,"Outilery"+IntegerToString(j),OBJPROP_RAY_RIGHT,true);
                        ObjectSet("Outilery"+IntegerToString(j),OBJPROP_COLOR,clrYellow);
                        ObjectSet("Outilery"+IntegerToString(j),OBJPROP_WIDTH,4); 
                        ObjectSet("Outilery"+IntegerToString(j),OBJPROP_BACK,0); 
                        
                        
                          ObjectCreate("Panacead"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, 1, Time[i+6], 55); 
                      ObjectSetText("Panacead"+DoubleToStr(i), "HEDGE>"+DoubleToStr(NormalizeDouble(iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,4,i-1))-20*Point,4),4), 32, "Impact", clrPurple);
                      ObjectSet("Panacead"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJPROP_BACK,1); 
                        
                        lastlowertrendline[lastlowertrendline_counter] = "Outilery"+IntegerToString(j);
                        lastlowertrendline_counter++;
                        ObjectDelete("Outileryy"+j); 
                        ObjectCreate(0,"Outileryy"+j,OBJ_TREND,0,Time[iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,j-1)],iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,2,j-1)),Time[iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,4,i-1)],iLow(symbol,0,iLowest(symbol,0,MODE_LOW,4,i-1)));
                        ObjectSetInteger(0,"Outileryy"+j,OBJPROP_RAY_RIGHT,true);
                        ObjectSet("Outileryy"+j,OBJPROP_COLOR,clrBlue);
                        ObjectSet("Outileryy"+j,OBJPROP_STYLE,1); 
                        ObjectSet("Outileryy"+j,OBJPROP_WIDTH,1); 
                        ObjectSet("Outileryy"+j,OBJPROP_BACK,0); 
                      }  
   }                 
}

The point of this part was to display out the limitations of human thinking, or at least the sensation of having nothing to grip on to which brings us to…

Einstein’s Fish

Use the following premises…

The Englishman lives in the red house.The Swede keeps dogs.The Dane drinks tea.The green house is just to the left of the white one.The owner of the green house drinks coffee.The Pall Mall smoker keeps birds.The owner of the yellow house smokes Dunhills.The man in the center house drinks milk.The Norwegian lives in the first house.The Blend smoker has a neighbor who keeps cats.The man who smokes Blue Masters drinks bier.The man who keeps horses lives next to the Dunhill smoker.The German smokes Prince.The Norwegian lives next to the blue house.The Blend smoker has a neighbor who drinks water.

…to conclude who keeps Fish.

It took me 41 minutes to figure out this one.

Trendline violation in mt4

The point of this entry was to show that to avoid fake breaks, you need to include displacements for the close that may be as much as 5 pips.

///trendline crossover vertical highlight (you need to know the exact syntax of the lines plotted)
 
locounter[i]=locounter[i+1];
   upcounter[i]=upcounter[i+1];

   j=0;
   while (j<lastlowertrendline_counter){ 
   llowertrendline = lastlowertrendline[j];
   
   Print("LL: "+llowertrendline);
   
   if ((Open[i]>ObjectGetValueByShift(llowertrendline, i) && Close[i]<ObjectGetValueByShift(llowertrendline, i)-30*Point))
   {
         ObjectCreate("PitusB"+lastlowertrendline[j]+IntegerToString(i),OBJ_VLINE,0, Time[i], 0);
      ObjectSet("PitusB"+lastlowertrendline[j]+IntegerToString(i), OBJPROP_COLOR, clrTomato );
      ObjectSet("PitusB"+lastlowertrendline[j]+IntegerToString(i), OBJPROP_WIDTH, 4 );
      ObjectSet("PitusB"+lastlowertrendline[j]+IntegerToString(i), OBJPROP_STYLE, 2 );
      ObjectSet("PitusB"+lastlowertrendline[j]+IntegerToString(i), OBJPROP_BACK, 1 );
      
            if (mastodon[i]>High[i] && ObjectGetValueByShift(llowertrendline, i)-High[i]<200*Point){
          ObjectCreate("PitusOBUP"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJ_TEXT, 0, Time[i], Low[i]+20*Point); 
          ObjectSetText("PitusOBUP"+DoubleToStr(i), CharToStr(240), 29, "Wingdings", clrFireBrick);     
         ObjectSet("PitusOBUP"+DoubleToStr(i), OBJPROP_BACK, 1 );    
      }
      
   }

Werk-file

…to show you some of my English raw materials currently on my phone – offering you this less harmful way to utilize your creative energy versus scamming other people out of their money.

Republican Dominic in the Dominican Republic

Rancho de Poncho de Sancho

Afterfile

Obsession in session

Habanero & Fulgewicht

Oat meal & goat milk

The Phoenix will rise again & will order fries again

Poisoned Magnet

Los Gerberas Des Abusivos

Brass hole

Now that we’ve found love

Now that we’ve found sex

What are you gonna flex?

On the train to training

But what am I saying

On this little bitty land

Trains have gone extinct

This dish is childish

Tears on my window

Hit & hiss

Nightfall, 9^th floor.

Republican Dominic in the Dominican Republic

Hi,

I’m from the communications department, and I would like to ask, what the fuck?

Buttered wings of a butterfly

Caught between a rock and a fart in the face

Flavor intensive

Amino cardiac acid

It stands to reason that

There is a reason to stand

Modest living

After a dance with no confidence

Sitting in a setting

On the brink of drinking

Nothing thrills the nostrils

Coming out of the dark

Naked

Maybe you should know

There will be life

At the end of the tunnel

Rag doll in the Trapdoor

Take it from the confidentist

It’s not too late to granulate

You cannot just stay

Dumbass-ticated 4ever

Too tame is too lame

Vanitatum Was Ist Los

Dandruff & Dandelions

Exploring new horizons?

We’ll just play it by the fear

The right man for the nightmare

Gets to play with

The underbelly of the underdog

Gets to say things

Like stranger than danger

Gets to take a deep threat

Before flipping a bird like that

Re-fried dreams

Sweet peas are made of these

& who am I to re-fry beans?

I trouble the world & the 7 seas

Everybody is choking on something

Shard Shooter

How bad are things? I read artists as arthritis.

I could stay awake, just to hear you crying…